This did not go well. It certainly could have gone much worse, but it gets worse the more I think about it. Mildly offensive at best. I'm sure Ms. Simon meant no harm. I'm sure she wasn't trying to insult me. But someone along the writing path needed to remind her of the sensitivity of her subject. How saying my jeans are "probably second hand or from Target" might be seen as an insult or how her humorous quips might be read more as jabs. How not all girls are the same and one geek is not like the others. We're not all unpopular, we're not all meek, we're not one thing. We don't all want beta boys, some of us don't even want a boy to begin with. These obvious flaws could have been rectified by acknowledging the differences. Part of what makes a geek a geek is that we don't fit a mold, we don't all have the same spots and strips. Just because we like stuff doesn't mean it completely defines every aspect of who we are. This book makes some pretty bold assumptions and backs them up by saying that she has created a community of geek girls the "Geek Girl Guild" who she has interacted with. "Women of all ages, backgrounds, and areas of geek expertise wanted to joined the sisterhood, making the first pledge class over one hundred strong!" - Introduction, page 5 (And yes, "joined" is a spelling mistake found in the book.)It makes me wonder how many of those 100 women read this book after it was published and went "Hold on a second." I will say that the most interesting part of the book for me was the quotes in the margins, some of which attributed to the non-famous, which I assume were taken from this group of women. These geek girls were happy, strong, and proud. Another positive were the small biographical paragraphs about various geek girls who have succeeded in there in field, change perceptions, or influenced geek culture. Those small elements were great to read and brought a smile to my face amidst the frowning. With that said however, lets talk about the frowning, and the scoffing, and the sighing, and the raging.I went into this book going off the title alone. I thought that anything geek girl oriented might be interesting to check out. I was wrong. I could only force myself to read so much and in the end, to be completely upfront, I only read the sections of this book that applied to me and as I identify myself as a geek. I couldn't force myself to read anymore. I read: IntroductionSection 1: Fangirl GeekSection 2: Literary Geek Section 7: Miscellaneous Geek (because that's a confidence boost)Conclusion: Geek Girls UniteThe other chapters are more in the same and I assure you were skimmed through diligently for the sake of this review. But these are the sections I will be going in depth.Brace yourselves, this is about to get ranty.We are gathered here as the Geek Girls of the world. Those of us focused on in this book are labeled by interest: Fangirl Geek, Literary Geek, Film Geek, Music Geek, Funny-Girl Geek, Domestic Goddess Geek, and Miscellaneous Geeks, which are Tech Geeks, Fashionista Geeks, Political Geek, Retro Geek, and Athletic Geek. The majority of this book, 99.9%, is about generalizing, quantifying, labeling, judging, assuming, and stereotyping who we are as people based off of a single interest. Now, this narrow-minded focus is bound to be exclusionary but things only get monumentally worse when Ms. Simon tries to apply humor to the situation. Her quips can easily be read as jabs, her silly throw-away pages easily read as insulting. At every turn there is another opportunity to judge and generalize, of course humorously. My glasses, my phone, everything is just another opportunity for a joke. To take one thing and boil it down to what that says about who I am.Then there's is the FRENDIEMIES page near end of each and every section. Allow me to explain. Frenemies is a combination between a friend and an enemy, "frenemies". These pages are basically a list of people who you shouldn't like, or at least not hang out with based on your geek cred. Because you know, we're in middle school and these people are clearly not cool enough to be seen with. Oh, you want some examples? Why, sure! Here some taken word-for-word from every section. Enjoy!- Athletes. - House guests who see your Sony PlayStation and ask if you live with a ten-year old.- Anyone who cheated their way through high school and college English literature classes by relying solely on CliffsNotes. - Members of the illiterati.- Simpletons who are only familiar with the term "word-play" because it's the name of a Jason Mraz Song.- Cheeseballs who still quote Napoleon Dynamite, Borat, or Austin Powers on a regular basis.- Poseurs who admit to being "really into film" after seeing one Wes Anderson movie.- Investment bankers, stock brokers, and various other Wall street douche bags.- Girls who wear leggings instead of pants.- Women who wear fragrances by celebrities. (except for those -approved by the author in a footnote.)- Know-it-alls who immediately launch into a "but is it art?" discussion after walking through a contemporary art exhibit.- Eccentrics who wear holiday or Cosby sweaters unironically.- Self-proclaimed artists who use paint-by-number kits.My word, these people are clearly just so beneath us. Let us banish them from our cool table and make them sit with losers at lunch.Suddenly geek girls are exclusionary, mean, would rather judge then share our knowledge, rather jump to conclusions then laugh, and willing to completely judge and shun a person based on a single trait.This pisses me off. People like what they like! Why is it necessary to be mean to each other? Geek girls know better then anyone that people who don't accept others for who they are aren't worth being around. And the fact that Ms. Simon is encouraging this sort of behavior make me angry. Let us not forget the previously mentioned Geek Love Checklist section. Which tells us traits to look for in the perfect geeky man. These pages manage to squeak by from my acceptance that I'm reading the same quality that can be found in your average $1.99 teen magazine. Till of course I saw this:"The Perfect Match For a Literary Geek Girl... Only reads one book at a time and thinks someone who's "in the middle" of numerous titles displays commitment issues. Which made me think this: Screw. You. Asshole....Remember how I told you that geek girls can be sensitive? The majority of us grow up being told what is normal, what is cool, what makes a girl desirable. If a guy said that to me, I'd get up and leave. Because I am a geek girl and I don't like elitism.Then there was a bunch on small things that bugged me.- The mislabeling of Harry Potter fanatics as "Muggles". - The 18 Twilight references in the Fangirl section. - The section dedicated to Twilight called "The Twilight Zone" which never even mentions the actual Twilight Zone. - Reading through the entire "Fangirl" section and not a single mention of "fandom", online community, or Firefly.- Reading through the Literary Geek section and not a single mention of "Young Adult", varying tastes, or a little word called genre.- The page title, "TAP THAT SASS".- The fact that the book lacks focus in the audience it is trying to appeal to. - The way that the Literary Geek section list books and information only about adult fiction and some early juvenile fiction. I found this annoying because these were not the books that geek girls love universally. These books are books everyone should read eventually, but you have to hold an interest for them and they have to be at your reading level. When going through all the adult fiction it was like reading a list of books for a college course.- The section on the "Political Geek Girl" has this lovely little snippet. "They strive to be advocates and activists; thus they often possess a pretty rigid set of values and ethics. (Some might call them stubborn or obstinate. Not me, of course, but some.) In an ideal world, everyone would see things their way." - page 172 - And so, so much more. I'm starting to get upset so I'm just going to stop there. I am a fangirl of epically giggly and badass proportions, fashion is my passion, music and film are my mistresses, and global politics is my dirty Sunday gal. But most importantly I am a literary geek who should warn all other such geeks to keep this book off their to-read lists. Not only is it not worth our time and money, but it is not worth the possible insult. As a girl, I refuse to be generalized. I am proud of who I am and that girl is not the geek that Ms. Simon thinks I should be.